Overview
Foundational principles guiding reliable and independent technical work.
IBPTECH structures its investigative and analytical work on principles designed to ensure reliability, reproducibility and independence. The approach combines scientific reasoning, documented procedures and cross-disciplinary technical expertise, providing a consistent framework for complex investigations, dispute support, compliance assessments and institutional decision-making..
Evidence-based workflows ensuring integrity across investigative processes.
Defined procedural steps guiding how evidence is planned, examined, validated and documented
Methodological Foundations
Structured investigative stages ensuring transparency, consistency and independent validation.
IBPTECH’s methodology is built on clearly defined stages of planning, acquisition, examination, validation and reporting. Each stage incorporates controls that support transparency, traceability and consistency across different types of technical work. Processes are documented to allow verification by external reviewers, courts, regulatory bodies or institutional partners when necessary.
The organisation prioritises methodological neutrality by avoiding assumptions, speculation or interpretive shortcuts. Findings emerge from structured analytical steps supported by evidence, logical inference and technical criteria. This approach is central to maintaining the independence required in high-stakes investigative environments.
Analytical Process Design
Structured analytical models guiding how technical investigations are conducted and validated
IBPTECH develops and applies analytical models that structure how investigations are conducted across multiple domains, including digital environments, engineering contexts, financial systems and intellectual property. These models define what is examined, how comparisons are made, what criteria guide interpretation and which validation steps are required to confirm results.
The design of such processes is influenced by scientific reasoning and practical experience accumulated over decades of investigative work. Models are continuously refined to incorporate new techniques, technologies and insights obtained from applied research and institutional practice.
Evidence Handling Principles
Safeguards ensuring that evidence remains intact, verifiable and methodologically sound.
Evidence is managed in accordance with procedures that preserve its integrity, authenticity and relevance. This includes controlled acquisition, secure handling, protection of original materials, and the maintenance of detailed records throughout the evidence lifecycle. Documentation is prioritised to ensure that any third party can understand how an item was obtained, preserved and interpreted.
Metadata, intermediate results and analytical artefacts are retained in a manner consistent with good forensic practice, allowing independent replication and review. These measures reinforce the technical defensibility of conclusions and support their use in judicial, regulatory or institutional contexts.
Lifecycle controls ensuring that original materials and metadata remain reliable and intact
Criteria, validation steps and analytical pathways in complex investigations
Analytical Process Design
Defined analytical pathways ensuring clarity, reproducibility and technical precision
IBPTECH develops and applies analytical models that structure how investigations are conducted across multiple domains, including digital environments, engineering contexts, financial systems and intellectual property. These models define what is examined, how comparisons are made, what criteria guide interpretation and which validation steps are required to confirm results.
The design of such processes is influenced by scientific reasoning and practical experience accumulated over decades of investigative work. Models are continuously refined to incorporate new techniques, technologies and insights obtained from applied research and institutional practice.
